Subscribe RSS

Hyundai’s Confidence is Showing Through Social Media

July 13th, 2010 by Bob Reed | No Comments | Filed in Marketing Inspiration

I’m in the market for good, late model used car.  While I like the idea of driving a new set of wheels off the lot, I dislike how much of the purchase price I’ll lose when they hit the street.

What make and model is in the lead that will handle two kids and a dog?  Not Honda, the Pilot is too pricey. Toyota would have been a lead off contender, but not today, not next year or maybe the next five.  Ford is coming back, but it doesn’t have a model that adequately suits my needs.

Like a lot more people, I’m looking at a Hyundai, specifically a 2009 Santa Fe — stylish, reliable and crash worthy.  With a family, I like to play it safe.  The company, however, is doing anything but, judging by its models, markets and marketing.

No Silver Bullet wrote about Hyundai’s different marketing approach last year.  So, when we learned about its new “Uncensored” campaign, we had to comment again.  Hyundai’s is exploiting growing confidence as a mature automaker and it is clear these folks are playing for keeps by eschewing the same, tired automobile marketing.

“Uncensored” captures what the car maker says are very organic conversations, unscripted, unedited remarks of drivers as they tested various Hyundai models in major U.S. cities this spring.  Now, a company would have lug nuts for brains if it were to air negative comments.  What’s notable is how the company takes the campaign two steps further.

First, according to the Hyundai press release,”125 non-Hyundai sedan owners will be given a new 2011 Sonata to drive for 30 days. Their comments will be posted – unscripted and unedited – on Hyundai’s Facebook site. The second is a multi-city ride-and-drive, which includes a video booth where consumers can film their drive impression and post video directly to their own Facebook page.”

Yeah, Hyundai has confidence… and some guts.

How odd.  A car company has me anticipating buying one of their cars, watching their commercials and searching out the comments on Facebook.  Better yet, amazing.

Tags: , , ,

Measuring Against “No”

May 21st, 2010 by Susan Duensing, CBC | 2 Comments | Filed in Marketing Inspiration

Talking about a new campaign, a client’s sales director recently said to me, “I’m the guy you call when the customer says “no.”

It got me thinking … this guy’s on fire!

We proceeded to have a productive conversation about all of the ways the company’s product solved problems, and provided ROI, for the customer.  Manna from heaven for a marketer!

And, an instant and provocative perspective to apply for evaluating content and promotional ideas – even brainstorming new ideas.

The first question to ask yourself:  How TRULY hard-hitting are the reasons you have for how your product or service fits your market?

If you were to use “no” as the answer to your company’s main pitch, where do you go from there? (A great question for sales training!)

To probe further:

  • How well are you appealing to your customers’ pain?
  • What about the ROI they can expect from buying your product or service?
  • How are you DIRECTLY addressing the real-world issues they’re facing?

Taken one by one and measuring against “no,” do all of your marketing and communications with your target stack up?

My guess … there is always room for improvement.

The Passion, or Human, Element

The purpose of what we marketers do each and every day is to find the most effective ways to educate, inform and persuade.

What I got from this sales director was passion, pure and simple. Passion and enthusiasm are almost as important as the facts we can present to support our sales pitch.  Passion comes from knowing our subject – not just the skinny about our own products or services, but our knowledge about the customer’s reality.

Passion also comes from personality.  We’ve all interacted with some really tremendous sales folks, and some not-so-tremendous.  How our pitch is presented, whether in person or some communications vehicle – can also convey that passion and personality.

So, what’s your company’s marketing personality? Is it coming across?  Can you better leverage it … capture a single rep’s passion … make it more interesting or fun … make it better than it currently is?

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Twitter Interview with Jason Baer

April 28th, 2010 by Bob Reed | No Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

As a lead-up to the PRSA Counselors Academy Conference, an annual meeting of independent PR agency owners (and an event I try to never miss), I interviewed social media superstar Jay Baer (@jaybaer) of Convince and Convert, who is presenting at this year’s confab. He is among a small group of forward-thinking social media strategists and luminaries who are helping the rest of us harness the  power of the social Web.

This is a recap of our conversation, matching the style of Jason’s well known Twitter interviews, on how PR agencies need to think about the practice of social and digital media.  Even if you aren’t with a PR agency, this has noteworthy information nonetheless.  It originally appeared on the PRSA blog, “Comprehension.”

@RAReed: We’re transitioning from thinking and talking about social media to doing and measuring its effect. What are agencies getting right?

  • @jaybaer: Social media is so all encompassing that it’s lost meaning to say that you’re good at social media. There are so many facets to it now.
  • The best break social media into pieces and focus on possibilities and outcomes, influence or outreach, brand community or social CRM.

@RAReed: On the flip-side, what are the biggest missteps agencies are making with social media?

  • @jaybaer: Agencies tend to silo their social expertise where they only have a couple people who are the social media experts.
  • There is too much focus on social outposts like Twitter accounts, a Facebook page or YouTube channel versus opportunities to be social.

@RAReed Larger agencies seemingly have the horse power to get a leg up on social media practices.  Where can smaller agencies catch up?

  • @jaybaer: I think smaller- and medium-sized agencies make the transition from traditional to social-enabled PR much easier than larger agencies.
  • Smaller agencies are closer to customers.  They adopt new services more easily  and can change what they do for the client with less internal friction.
  • Large agencies can dedicate staff to social media but that’s not necessarily good.  But they have clients that can experiment more.

@RAReed: What skill sets related to social media do the majority of agencies still need to develop? SEO immediately comes to mind.

  • Content optimization and analytics in all forms and fashion. It’s being better at Excel instead of Word.
  • Marketing is not a campaign any more.  Think of it more as a river and that changes everything.  Monitor and respond in real time.

@RAReed: What are you out to convey in the pre-con session that won’t be covered in the regular CA sessions?

  • @jaybaer: We’ll talk through the social media planning process to build a sustainable strategic framework around all social activities.
  • I want people to learn how to be social and not just how to do social.  Forget thinking Facebook, Twitter or Youtube.  Be tool agnostic.

@RAReed: What are the three or four most important things agencies can do to differentiate and market their social media offerings?

  • @Jaybaer: Understand the science and math of social media.  There is a lot there that people don’t gravitate toward as much as they should.
  • Know the data and numbers.  There’s a right time to tweet, a best way to update Facebook and the right way to search optimize a blog.
  • Help clients with social media CRM and customer retention more than campaigns or the customer acquisition component.
  • In the end we’ll wonder why we thought social media was good for customer acquisition when it’s clearly a loyalty and retention tool.

@RAReed:  What are the first, most important steps an agency should engage in to build its social media presence?

  • @Jaybaer: Understand what you’re good at, be specific about it and then create and atomize content that supports that supposition.
  • Whether it be blogs, podcasts, webinars, speeches, know where you have to participate in the inbound marketing domain.
  • Embrace giving away info snacks in order to eat a meal down the road.
  • Drive content awareness via search optimization. People will eventually find and recognize you as actually good at that particular thing.

@RAReed:  I need a one word answer to this last question: In 2010, when it comes to social media, PR agencies must _________.

  • I’ll have to give it to you in two words: embrace math.

Tags: , , , ,

Apple Vs. the Evening News: Lesson in Re-Defining a Category

April 16th, 2010 by Susan Duensing, CBC | 2 Comments | Filed in Innovation Series

 

There’s a ‘shock & awe’ quote for you.  I use it frequently in client meetings and presentations because it puts the importance of both into a light that many just don’t consider.

Every company markets to one extent or another; but not every company is innovating.

Innovation, especially for legacy organizations, isn’t easy.  Competition on a worldwide scale brings the perpetual better mousetrap. Those that don’t keep up lose market share and eventually go by the wayside.

Not News Directors; “Funeral Directors”

Take the network news shows.  I was amused by a former newsman’s remarks about the decline of network news, and the rise of cable. “News Directors should instead be called, Funeral Directors,” he said, explaining that the viewership decline was due to the fact that the shows continue to broadcast the same thing: the same format, the same programming, that they did three decades ago. 

“They’re no longer relevant.  They’re not managing ideas — they’re not even coming up with any.”

Contrast the networks’ dilemma with the top tech firms – all continually re-defining their categories in one way or another.  With Google’s sudden rise and massive success being first to market with internet search ads (one of many possible examples), Microsoft, Apple and others race to re-define their own services.

Apple – always positioned with that edgy difference – perhaps best exemplifies successful re-definition with the Mac®, the iPod®, the iPhone®, and now, the iPad®.

Apple is admired on many levels.  But what makes it a true bellwether is how masterfully it embodies, and proves, Drucker’s sage words.

 More on Re-Defining Your Product or Service to come in Part 3 of this Series

Tags: , , , ,

The Tiger Woods/Nike Ad: Gross Manipulation with Forethought

April 9th, 2010 by Bob Reed | 1 Comment | Filed in Shooting Blanks

The new Nike/Tiger Woods commercial is a compelling piece of art.  Nike’s ad agency created a spot you can’t turn away while eliciting a range of opinions about intent and effectiveness.  It’s brilliant.

Tiger’s “called-out-on-the-carpet” expression touches that part of anyone who has struggled with perpetrating a huge wrong.  It got to me.  I recall a subpar semester at college and dreading my mother’s reaction when she saw my grades.  Instead of yelling, she calmly stated “what you’ll get out of college is what you put into it.”  In those few words I was cut down yet made to never forget.

But in my opinion the ad did nothing to help Woods or Nike.  There is no ethical stance from the subject or the sponsor.  With the help of some very creative people, Nike and Woods worked together to create pure manipulation.

Let’s look at this as a process. People developed the concept, consulted on it and then sold it into Woods.  Then more people researched archived audio; shot the footage; edited it, and aired it.  All planned.  We’ll never know what went on behind the scenes with Nike and Woods on how they arrived at the agreement to maintain their relationship.  Maybe in an attempt to justify behavior, Nike knows that it and Tiger are tightly linked.  Over the years, think of all that video footage of Tiger where the Nike logo is present.

I recall a line from the early 80‘s movie, “The Big Chill”. When Jeff Goldblum’s character, Michael, explains why he squanders his brilliant writing ability by penning stories for People magazine, he says “Don’t knock rationalization. Where would we be without it? I don’t know anyone who’d get through the day without two or three juicy rationalizations.”

I did see a brilliant ad, as well as faux contrition supported by crass commercialism. A pained-looking Tiger reacting to his dad’s words never would have seen the light of day if that conversation actually took place.

Tags: , , , , ,

20 Things That Happen When There Is No Plan For Social Media

April 1st, 2010 by Bob Reed | 2 Comments | Filed in Planning

What happens when you don’t plan your use of social media?  The same thing that occurs with any other PR, advertising and marketing communications tactics.  You end up doing the wrong things, at the wrong time, with the wrong focus.

If you don’t plan, you:

  • start doing before listening.
  • think social media is traditional marketing.
  • won’t know how social media fits into your company’s overall strategy.
  • don’t recognize how social media should complement your overall marketing strategy.
  • won’t know who to engage and where to find your audience.
  • can’t know if the bulk of your customers are or are not online.
  • won’t know what it is you want to get out of social media.
  • approach Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn as strategies.
  • won’t know the difference between a group page and a fan page on Facebook.
  • believe the here-and-there-post approach to blogging will build an audience.
  • think the number of fans/followers is the only metric that matters.
  • can’t decide who from your company will engage your online audience.
  • fail to determine how much time to spend on social media.
  • believe you control the message.
  • assume that social media tools don’t have a cost.
  • ignore setting accurate benchmarks.
  • won’t hone your message for simplicity and clarity.
  • pass up the opportunity to demonstrate what you know.
  • ignore the fact that social media tools are temporary.
  • expect to only get when you don’t give.

What would you add to this list?

Tags: , , ,

Banks Need Actions Over Image

March 25th, 2010 by Bob Reed | No Comments | Filed in Reputation

I winced when I saw this flow by on Twitter this morning:

Banks and insurance companies to launch ‘image-improvement campaign’ http://www.prdaily.com/

Those quote marks say it all. It’s going to take a lot more than an image campaign when the level of trust of these institutions have is equivalent to a Bentley running on fumes in the middle of Death Valley.

These guys don’t need an image campaign, they need a trust transplant. They’re eligible for that only if their words are linked to concrete actions.  I hope the three agencies behind this effort will supply that advice.

The financial services industry is planning their comeback to win the hearts and minds of… Congress, for the simple fact that they’re dead set against any kind of regulatory structure that will inhibit growth, profits and multi-million dollar year-end bonuses, even in one the country’s worst financial crisis and billions of taxpayer TARP money that helped fuel their ledgers back to black.

From the Bloomberg story that PR Daily referenced, I learned this not so startling fact: “Since the beginning of 2009, large banks and financial firms have spent more than $500 million on lobbying and campaign contributions, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the largest U.S. business lobby, spent $144 million last year to influence federal officials, according to Senate records.”

The people who think banks and insurance companies only need an “image” campaign” are the people who work for banks and insurance companies.  Many of the rest of us know that the flagrant abuses leveled at smaller businesses and consumers won’t be forgotten or forgiven until the industry makes substantial changes in how it makes its money, or the federal government forces the issue through regulation.  If banks choose the former, no amount of money spent on a severly damaged reputation will make a difference.

As Matt Taibbi wrote earlier this month in Rolling Stone, “Instituting a bailout policy that stressed recapitalizing bad banks was like the addict coming back to the con man to get his lost money back. Ask yourself how well that ever works out.”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

How Might Kids Perceive Toyota Now?

March 13th, 2010 by Bob Reed | No Comments | Filed in Reputation

The repairs at Toyota dealerships continue as the news of the recall and the sheer number of Toyotas on the road are an ever present reminder that the company has a problem.  Talk about a Catch-22.

When Toyota eventually gets to the downward slope of it’s Everest-sized speed bump, what will it do to repair its broken reputation, not only for consumers of driving age, but those who are simply passengers in their cars? Considering a conversation I had with my daughter this weekend, Toyota better start planning its long march back now.

Kate, who’s getting close to 10, was sitting in the back seat of our 12-year-old Subaru Outback, returning with me from a trip to the movies when she said this:

“Why does Toyota lie?” she asked.

“Well,” I said, wanting to present a balanced picture of Toyota’s response to the crisis; the incidents and number of recalls that occur with all car makers; and intricacies involved in replicating engineering and mechanical failures, “Toyota didn’t necessarily lie.  The problem with its cars is a bit complicated.”

“Why is it complicated?” she pressed.  “If Toyota knew its cars had a problem why didn’t they try to fix it sooner?”

Wow.  Kate is no news junkie by any stretch, but she is an avid reader.  Maybe I should re-up my subscription to the Chicago Tribune.

“It’s like those commercials,” she continued.  “Some offer deals to get people to buy their cars, but the other commercials where people are talking about how happy they are with their cars seem fake.”

‘Well, honey, I think Toyota will be fine,” I responded.  “People will continue to buy their cars.”

To that, Kate said flatly:  “Those people are chumps.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

Driving Innovation in a Threatening Economy

March 10th, 2010 by Susan Duensing, CBC | 3 Comments | Filed in Innovation Series

Business Wisdom from C. Richard Panico, President, Integrated Project Management Co., Inc.

IPM President C. Richard Panico

Note: This is the first in a new series of interviews with Element-R clients, associates and friends.  Here, IPM President Rich Panico elaborates on comments made in a mid-2009 company newsletter, beginning with an article excerpt.

“This is truly an exciting time, one ripe with opportunities, as our clients and prospective clients, like us, are faced with unprecedented challenges. Any tolerance for inefficiencies, mis-steps, and protracted and failed execution will lead to magnified negative consequences in an unforgiving market.  Business as usual will not be an option for those who expect to rise above the competition and maintain or grow their businesses.

I happen to believe that ’normal’ will be redefined over the next several years and our new reality will render many past trends and reference points meaningless.

Even further, established business models long associated with market dominance will prove to be debilitating and unresponsive to the new competitive landscape. The need for change will be an understatement. Leading organizations will realize that progressive transformation is essential. They will have to create an evolving capacity to add greater value, differentiate, innovate, and address anticipated market opportunities faster, better, and cheaper. Progressive transformation will require processes, discipline, and leadership (emphasis on discipline and leadership). It will also require companies to engage in a cultural evolution and, in some cases, a revolution.”

Element-R (ER):  Rich, I found your point that every business must create “an evolving capacity to add value, etc.” particularly compelling, even in 2010, since so many firms are struggling with the economy, and as you said, with a truly new competitive landscape.  How does IPM guide its clients to achieve this “evolving capacity?”

IPM:  We apply an approach we refer to as Transformational Project Management (TPM), which integrates change management into the essence of getting things done.  The key to effecting sustainable change lies within the company’s culture.  The culture must be evolved and continually nurtured to enable people to initiate, accept, and expect change. This begins by cultivating a mindset that views change as a significant competitive advantage and requisite to security and opportunity.

As part of executing game changing initiatives, we become acutely aware of a company’s culture, its enablers, and inhibitors.  Project strategies are developed that incorporate cultural considerations, so we are not just focused to executing an initiative and meeting an objective, but also creating a motivating dynamic that becomes the benchmark and catalyst for ongoing collaboration, continuous improvement, and innovation. Our goal is to infuse a high performance psychological dimension that influences attitudes and behaviors.

Transformational PM is essential if a company is facing a point of inflexion that requires adaptation to new competitive influences and/or market shifts.  In these situations, change requires employee support and commitment that cannot be solely and readily elicited through the communication of strategies and plans, new processes and procedures, or consequential considerations.  Transformational project management is designed to convert transactional interfaces to collaborative relationships, tasks to personal commitments, and objectives to sustainable improvements.  It is equally impactful on existing processes and procedures, as on new strategic initiatives and projects.

The whole Transformation process is ultimately about creating an environment of synchronicity, one where functional organizations energize rather than interfere with each other.  Organizational objectives have to be meshed to produce a desired outcome … achieving them requires more than designing protocols and  processes.  The objectives require acceptance, and acceptance in its highest form recognizes meaningful value.  Organizational members need to understand and envision the benefits to themselves, and to the company.

ER:   Where do you begin with a client in generating Transformation?

IPM:  First we make sure that there is management buy-in, real buy-in to the transparency that is required to identify and accept that the root causes of resistance to change often stem from leadership tendencies, politics, and displayed priorities.  Additionally, we identify the end goal, the objective, and ensure its clear understanding.  Beginning with an ambiguous destination is suicide.

Then we undergo a discovery phase that includes an analysis of the culture.  We look for degrees of separation on philosophies and values at all levels – are the executive and functional leaders all aligned? Then we look at leadership styles and priorities.  If there is not harmony among them, it is likely that employees are confused or at minimum, are facing cross-functional inefficiencies.  We work with clients to help create alignment of purpose and a sustainable and continuously improving ability to execute projects that evolve the business.

ER:  How, specifically, does IPM help its clients drive the innovation that is so desperately needed?

IPM: Innovation at its core is a product of the company’s culture.

ER: That’s an interesting take – usually you think of innovation as an outcome of R&D.

IPM:  Exactly!   Innovation is not just about the science or other skills that are behind a product or service.  Systemic innovation requires a culture that is continually seeking to outdo itself and pre-empt competitive challenges and market opportunities.

Many companies lack this aggressiveness. You see examples of this everywhere, especially among firms servicing a market with products/services that have been very successful over a long period, and are in their sunsets. The common way companies acquire innovation these days is by purchasing it – they attain it (inorganic growth), versus generating it (organic growth).  Inorganic growth as the sole source of innovation eventually leads to an eroded market position.

ER:  So how does IPM help them get on the path to organic growth?

IPM: Again our work starts at a high level with the company’s mission, vision and purpose.  We ask our clients about the focus of their businesses and the markets they are pursuing.

IPM legitimizes that vision (does it still apply?), then looks at other companies with the same purpose, and how value is being delivered by each competitor, including how cost enters the picture.  This allows us to baseline where a company stands compared to its competitors, and, where it stands with customers.

We then review the needs of their customers.  If the need is being fulfilled to the full extent, to innovate beyond it could be a waste of time.  Value must be perceptible to the end buyer.

Then we ask, is there an ancillary market need?  Do the company’s talents allow it to develop a derivative, adjunct or separate product or service that either fulfills an additional unanswered need; or, creates an entirely new market by satisfying a newly identified need with a breakthrough product or service?

ER:  Yes, finding and filling an unanticipated market need has always been the name of the game.  You see it most obviously with Apple, and its tremendous success creating entirely new capabilities in products the market has not even asked for.  This whole subject is covered in the book, Blue Ocean Strategy – Cirque de Soleil is one of its many case studies, showing how a new service category was born from the combination of ‘circus’ and ‘theater’ for an adult audience.

IPM:  Right.  In order to enable success on either path (better fulfilling an existing need, or creating a breakthrough product or service), companies have to create a participative and engaged culture!  Many innovative ideas have been spawned through the active idea generation of an organization that understands the leadership vision and is inspired to contribute.

The most overlooked innovation capacity is that which resides internal to an organization and remains as latent potential.  It is imperative that companies heighten all employees’ awareness of the urgency of innovation in all forms, in all functions (not only the delivered product or service).   The best way to create innovation in products and services sold externally is to inspire innovation within the internal functions, processes, and structures.  This helps establish a natural tendency to improve.

In every initiative and project, it is important to identify:

What is the objective?

What are the expectations?

Why are we doing this?

What are the collective and individual benefits?

What is happens if we maintain status quo?

What are the consequences of failure?

Innovation, or the lack thereof, can be a major threat to a business.  Today, it’s not just about surviving or sustaining – it’s about growing and evolving.

The beauty of this economy is that it is extraordinarily challenging.  Companies have the opportunity to use the current situation to rally the troops to new objectives, and a new common cause: SURVIVAL.

In conclusion, an innovative environment is not a simple recipe.  There are practical, systemic, philosophical, and other components that are part of, and individualized for, any business model.  There are the mission/vision/values, the people, the processes, the facilities, etc., all coming into play.

Innovation, as a product of culture, becomes a function of inspiration.  Many can recite business school approaches to innovation.  However, what makes the recipes work or fail is the greater or lesser commitment to creating an engaged and inspired workforce bound by  pragmatic, value-generating objectives and enduring values and philosophies.  In short, companies have to engage  the minds and the hearts.

It follows that companies can put the same processes in place in an effort to innovate, yet one succeed and the other fail.  The key to establishing a culture of innovation lies in establishing a strong psychological affinity to this endeavor. In its highest form, the organization will achieve an unprecedented spirit of collaboration and performance.  Culture is the result of leadership and innovation is the result of culture.

ER: Fascinating insights, Rich, into how companies need to think about moving their businesses to a higher level. Thank you!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Plan A Little Leeway

February 19th, 2010 by Bob Reed | 7 Comments | Filed in Uncategorized

Like most people, I expect that when I toss my business card into a bowl to win something, what I get is one less business card to carry around.

My luck changed at my local Jimmy John’s sandwich shop last week.  It turned out the distinctive Element-R business card was either randomly picked, or someone said, “Oooo.  Cool card.  Let’s pick that one!” to reward me with their “Enter to Win” giveaway bowl.

The e-mail telling me I won stated “With this, you have been chosen to receive one Jimmy John’s 15 piece party platter!  This platter will contain your choice of 5 sub sandwiches (#1 thru #6) to share with your friends, family, or coworkers!”

Cool.  I had planned to use this free lunch giveaway for a family dinner party of Austrian and German dishes we’re hosting this weekend where I know the stuff I’m prepping will be greeted with some kids scrunching up their faces and turning up their noses.  “What, you don’t want steak tar tare and goulash?  Here, go gnaw a sub.”

But, after a very hectic week, I cashed in my e-mail last night for a quick dinner.  I called the store, placed the order, and asked that the sandwiches not be cut into thirds, producing this exchange:

JJW (Jimmy John’s Worker): “We have to cut them to make them fit on the platter.”

Me: “I don’t want the platter, I just want whole sandwiches.”

JJW: “You won the platter, so they have to be cut.”

Me: “Why?  Can’t you just make the sandwiches without cutting them?”

JJW: “No…  Uh, well… Let me ask my manager.”

After about a minute, the sandwich maker returned to the phone.

JJW: “The contest is about winning the platter, sir.  It’s what it says.”

Me:  “OK, you’re going to make the sandwiches and wrap them in paper, right?”

JJW: “Yes”

Me: “Here’s what you do… Make the sandwiches, wrap them in paper, but just don’t pick up the knife.”

JJW: “Uh, let me go call the district manager.”

After about 30 seconds, he returns to the phone.

JJW: “Uh, OK.  We’ll do it this one time, but if you enter and win again, you have to take the platter.”

Me: “You bet.”

The sandwiches that my family consumed last night were typical, tasty Jimmy John’s fare.  But the rules and procedures in which sometimes corporations and their franchises tightly wrap themselves can create unnecessary problems.

Jimmy John’s could have planned a little empowerment and given the person I spoke with some leeway to fulfill my simple request, making my winning the contest a short and satisfying encounter, not one where I had to coach the sandwich maker to think and run up a simple request up the chain of command.

Tags: , , , ,